Plain language summary
Knowledge of plant-based diets is important for clinicians to be able to engage with patients about the health benefits and potential concerns. To date, the nutrient composition and nutrient adequacy of these diets has not been thoroughly assessed. The aim of this study was to estimate theoretical food and nutrient levels of whole-food plant-based (WFPB) and vegan diets and compare these levels to the US dietary recommendations. Self-identified vegan and WFPB diet followers reported their most frequently used books and websites for nutritional information and recipes. Using these sources, 30 days of theoretical meal plans were created, and this data was compared to recommendations from a MyPlate meal plan. This data was analysed to measure adherence to the 2015 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. This analysis showed the theoretical nutrient intake from a WFPB diet deviate significantly from MyPlate recommendations. The WFPB diet offered improved quality compared to the typical US diet, providing more nutrient-dense foods with less refined grains and added sugars. While WFPB diets are of higher quality in general, they risk deficiencies of vitamins B12 and D and calcium without adequate supplementation. Based on this analysis, the authors encourage patients to consider a plant-based dietary pattern with attention given to consuming calcium-rich foods, iodised salt, and using supplements for vitamins B12 and D. The authors comment that future research should examine the actual dietary intakes of these groups, rather than the theoretical, to assess actual nutrient intake and adherence to diet.
Abstract
Public interest in popular diets is increasing, in particular whole-food plant-based (WFPB) and vegan diets. Whether these diets, as theoretically implemented, meet current food-based and nutrient-based recommendations has not been evaluated in detail. Self-identified WFPB and vegan diet followers in the Adhering to Dietary Approaches for Personal Taste (ADAPT) Feasibility Survey reported their most frequently used sources of information on nutrition and cooking. Thirty representative days of meal plans were created for each diet. Weighted mean food group and nutrient levels were calculated using the Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR) and data were compared to DRIs and/or USDA Dietary Guidelines/MyPlate meal plan recommendations. The calculated HEI-2015 scores were 88 out of 100 for both WFPB and vegan meal plans. Because of similar nutrient composition, only WFPB results are presented. In comparison to MyPlate, WFPB meal plans provide more total vegetables (180%), green leafy vegetables (238%), legumes (460%), whole fruit (100%), whole grains (132%), and less refined grains (-74%). Fiber level exceeds the adequate intakes (AI) across all age groups. WFPB meal plans failed to meet the Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDA)s for vitamin B12 and D without supplementation, as well as the RDA for calcium for women aged 51⁻70. Individuals who adhere to WFBP meal plans would have higher overall dietary quality as defined by the HEI-2015 score as compared to typical US intakes with the exceptions of calcium for older women and vitamins B12 and D without supplementation. Future research should compare actual self-reported dietary intakes to theoretical targets.
Methodological quality
Jadad score
:
Not applicable
Allocation concealment
:
Not applicable
